TY - JOUR
T1 - Does interaction occur between risk factors for revision total knee arthroplasty?
AU - Bounajem, Georges J.
AU - DeClercq, Josh
AU - Collett, Garen
AU - Ayers, Gregory D.
AU - Jain, Nitin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Several risk factors for revision TKA have previously been identified, but interactions between risk factors may occur and affect risk of revision. To our knowledge, such interactions have not been previously studied. As patients often exhibit multiple risk factors for revision, knowledge of these interactions can help improve risk stratification and patient education prior to TKA. Materials and methods: The State Inpatient Databases (SID), part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), were queried to identify patients who underwent TKA between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015. Risk factors for revision TKA were identified, and interactions between indication for TKA and other risk factors were analyzed. Results: Of 958,944 patients who underwent TKA, 33,550 (3.5%) underwent revision. Age, sex, race, length of stay, Elixhauser readmission score, urban/rural designation, and indication for TKA were significantly associated with revision (p < 0.05). Age was the strongest predictor (p < 0.0001), with younger patients exhibiting higher revision risk. Risks associated with age were modified by an interaction with indication for TKA (p < 0.0001). There was no significant interaction between sex and indication for TKA (p = 0.535) or race and indication for TKA (p = 0.187). Conclusions: Age, sex, race, length of stay, Elixhauser readmission score, urban/rural designation, and indication for TKA are significantly associated with revision TKA. Interaction occurs between age and indication.
AB - Introduction: Several risk factors for revision TKA have previously been identified, but interactions between risk factors may occur and affect risk of revision. To our knowledge, such interactions have not been previously studied. As patients often exhibit multiple risk factors for revision, knowledge of these interactions can help improve risk stratification and patient education prior to TKA. Materials and methods: The State Inpatient Databases (SID), part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), were queried to identify patients who underwent TKA between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015. Risk factors for revision TKA were identified, and interactions between indication for TKA and other risk factors were analyzed. Results: Of 958,944 patients who underwent TKA, 33,550 (3.5%) underwent revision. Age, sex, race, length of stay, Elixhauser readmission score, urban/rural designation, and indication for TKA were significantly associated with revision (p < 0.05). Age was the strongest predictor (p < 0.0001), with younger patients exhibiting higher revision risk. Risks associated with age were modified by an interaction with indication for TKA (p < 0.0001). There was no significant interaction between sex and indication for TKA (p = 0.535) or race and indication for TKA (p = 0.187). Conclusions: Age, sex, race, length of stay, Elixhauser readmission score, urban/rural designation, and indication for TKA are significantly associated with revision TKA. Interaction occurs between age and indication.
KW - Database
KW - Revision
KW - Risk factor
KW - TKA
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175193327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85175193327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00402-023-05107-2
DO - 10.1007/s00402-023-05107-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 37902892
AN - SCOPUS:85175193327
SN - 0936-8051
JO - Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
JF - Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
ER -