TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a Skin-Directed Scoring System for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Epidermal Necrolysis
T2 - A Delphi Consensus Exercise
AU - Waters, Margo
AU - Dobry, Allison
AU - Le, Stephanie T.
AU - Shinkai, Kanade
AU - Beachkofsky, Thomas M.
AU - Davis, Mark D.P.
AU - Dominguez, Arturo R.
AU - Kroshinsky, Daniela
AU - Markova, Alina
AU - Micheletti, Robert G.
AU - Mostaghimi, Arash
AU - Pasieka, Helena B.
AU - Rosenbach, Misha
AU - Seminario-Vidal, Lucia
AU - Trinidad, John
AU - Albrecht, Joerg
AU - Altman, Emily M.
AU - Arakaki, Ryan
AU - Ardern-Jones, Michael
AU - Bridges, Alina G.
AU - Cardones, Adela R.
AU - Chadha, Angad A.
AU - Chen, Jennifer K.
AU - Chen, Steven T.
AU - Cheng, Kyle
AU - Daveluy, Steven
AU - Deniro, Katherine L.
AU - Harp, Joanna
AU - Keller, Jesse J.
AU - King, Brett
AU - Korman, Abraham M.
AU - Lowenstein, Eve J.
AU - Luxenberg, Erin
AU - Mancuso, Jennifer Brescoll
AU - Mauskar, Melissa M.
AU - Milam, Philip
AU - Motaparthi, Kiran
AU - Nelson, Caroline A.
AU - Nguyen, Cuong V.
AU - Nutan, Fnu
AU - Ortega-Loayza, Alex G.
AU - Patel, Tejesh
AU - Rahnama-Moghadam, Sahand
AU - Rekhtman, Sergey
AU - Rojek, Nathan W.
AU - Sarihan, Mansi
AU - Shaigany, Sheila
AU - Sharma, Timmie R.
AU - Shearer, Sabrina M.
AU - Shields, Bridget E.
AU - Strowd, Lindsay C.
AU - Tartar, Danielle M.
AU - Thomas, Cristina
AU - Wanat, Karolyn A.
AU - Walls, Andrew C.
AU - Zaba, Lisa C.
AU - Ziemer, Carolyn M.
AU - Maverakis, Emanual
AU - Kaffenberger, Benjamin H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/7/19
Y1 - 2023/7/19
N2 - Importance: Scoring systems for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and epidermal necrolysis (EN) only estimate patient prognosis and are weighted toward comorbidities and systemic features; morphologic terminology for EN lesions is inconsistent. Objectives: To establish consensus among expert dermatologists on EN terminology, morphologic progression, and most-affected sites, and to build a framework for developing a skin-directed scoring system for EN. Evidence Review: A Delphi consensus using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria was initiated with a core group from the Society of Dermatology Hospitalists to establish agreement on the optimal design for an EN cutaneous scoring instrument, terminology, morphologic traits, and sites of involvement. Findings: In round 1, the 54 participating dermatology hospitalists reached consensus on all 49 statements (30 appropriate, 3 inappropriate, 16 uncertain). In round 2, they agreed on another 15 statements (8 appropriate, 7 uncertain). There was consistent agreement on the need for a skin-specific instrument; on the most-often affected skin sites (head and neck, chest, upper back, ocular mucosa, oral mucosa); and that blanching erythema, dusky erythema, targetoid erythema, vesicles/bullae, desquamation, and erosions comprise the morphologic traits of EN and can be consistently differentiated. Conclusions and Relevance: This consensus exercise confirmed the need for an EN skin-directed scoring system, nomenclature, and differentiation of specific morphologic traits, and identified the sites most affected. It also established a baseline consensus for a standardized EN instrument with consistent terminology.
AB - Importance: Scoring systems for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and epidermal necrolysis (EN) only estimate patient prognosis and are weighted toward comorbidities and systemic features; morphologic terminology for EN lesions is inconsistent. Objectives: To establish consensus among expert dermatologists on EN terminology, morphologic progression, and most-affected sites, and to build a framework for developing a skin-directed scoring system for EN. Evidence Review: A Delphi consensus using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria was initiated with a core group from the Society of Dermatology Hospitalists to establish agreement on the optimal design for an EN cutaneous scoring instrument, terminology, morphologic traits, and sites of involvement. Findings: In round 1, the 54 participating dermatology hospitalists reached consensus on all 49 statements (30 appropriate, 3 inappropriate, 16 uncertain). In round 2, they agreed on another 15 statements (8 appropriate, 7 uncertain). There was consistent agreement on the need for a skin-specific instrument; on the most-often affected skin sites (head and neck, chest, upper back, ocular mucosa, oral mucosa); and that blanching erythema, dusky erythema, targetoid erythema, vesicles/bullae, desquamation, and erosions comprise the morphologic traits of EN and can be consistently differentiated. Conclusions and Relevance: This consensus exercise confirmed the need for an EN skin-directed scoring system, nomenclature, and differentiation of specific morphologic traits, and identified the sites most affected. It also established a baseline consensus for a standardized EN instrument with consistent terminology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165518469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165518469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.1347
DO - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.1347
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37256599
AN - SCOPUS:85165518469
SN - 2168-6068
VL - 159
SP - 772
EP - 777
JO - JAMA Dermatology
JF - JAMA Dermatology
IS - 7
ER -