Development and validation of a scoring system for predicting clinical coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: the PROGRESS-CTO perforation score

Spyridon Kostantinis, Bahadir Simsek, Judit Karacsonyi, Khaldoon Alaswad, Farouc A. Jaffer, Jaikirshan J. Khatri, James W. Choi, Wissam A. Jaber, Stéphane Rinfret, William Nicholson, Mitul P. Patel, Ehtisham Mahmud, Catalin Toma, Rhian E. Davies, Jimmy L. Kerrigan, Elias V. Haddad, Sevket Gorgulu, Nidal Abi-Rafeh, Ahmed M. ElGuindy, Omer GoktekinSalman Allana, M. Nicholas Burke, Olga C. Mastrodemos, Bavana V. Rangan, Emmanouil S. Brilakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery perforation is a feared complication of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and often leads to serious adverse clinical events. Aims: We sought to develop a risk score to predict clinical coronary artery perforation in patients undergoing CTO PCI. Methods: We analysed clinical and angiographic parameters from 9,618 CTO PCIs in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO). Logistic regression prediction modelling was used to identify variables independently associated with clinical perforation, and the model was internally validated with bootstrapping. Clinical coronary artery perforation was defined as any perforation requiring treatment. Results: The incidence of clinical coronary perforation was 3.8% (n=367). Five factors were independently associated with perforation and were included in the score: patient age ≥65 years +1 point (odds ratio [OR] 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37-2.33), moderate/severe calcification +1 point (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.41-2.42), blunt/no stump +1 point (OR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.10-1.92), use of antegrade dissection and reentry +1 point (OR 2.43, 95% CI: 1.61-3.69), and use of the retrograde approach +2 points (OR 4.02, 95% CI: 2.95-5.46). The resulting score showed acceptable performance on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.741, 95% CI: 0.712-0.773). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a good fit (p=0.991), and internal validation with bootstrapping demonstrated good agreement with the model with observed AUC: 0.736 (95% bias-corrected CI: 0.706-0.767). Conclusions: The PROGRESS-CTO perforation score may be a useful tool for predicting clinical coronary perforation during CTO PCI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1022-1030
Number of pages9
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume18
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • chronic coronary total occlusion
  • coronary rupture
  • pericardial effusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and validation of a scoring system for predicting clinical coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: the PROGRESS-CTO perforation score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this