Abstract
The authors regret to state that the y-axis label of Figure 5B is incorrectly labelled in the manuscript and should be in micrometers, (micro-m). The first “m” in “mm” should be a Greek “μ”. As such the unit in the text in Sec 3.4 p. 8806 should read “Accelerated re-epithelialization was statistically greater for the gelatin/PEG hydrogel (6.17 ± 2 μm, p = 0.011) and the MSC–gelatin/PEG biomatrix (6.59 ± 2 μm, p = 0.0041) treatments compared with the sham wound…”. The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 561 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Acta Biomaterialia |
Volume | 58 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Aug 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biotechnology
- Biomaterials
- Biochemistry
- Biomedical Engineering
- Molecular Biology