TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - Synthesis and structure−activity relationships of DCLK1 kinase inhibitors based on a 5,11-dihydro‑6H‑benzo[e]pyrimido[5,4‑b][1,4]diazepin-6-one Scaffold (Journal of Medical Chemistry (2020) 63:14 (7817−7826) DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00596)
AU - Ferguson, Fleur M.
AU - Liu, Yan
AU - Harshbarger, Wayne
AU - Huang, Ling
AU - Wang, Jinhua
AU - Deng, Xianming
AU - Capuzzi, Stephen J.
AU - Muratov, Eugene N.
AU - Tropsha, Alexander
AU - Muthuswamy, Senthil
AU - Westover, Kenneth D.
AU - Gray, Nathanael S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Chemical Society
PY - 2020/9/10
Y1 - 2020/9/10
N2 - Page from: 7819. Column 1, paragraph 3 should be corrected “Having failed to improve the selectivity via substitution of R2 or R3, we turned to exploration of the R4 group. DCLK1 and LRRK2 possess a methionine gatekeeper residue (Met465 and Met1947, respectively), unlike ERK5, which has a leucine gatekeeper (Leu137). Examination of the ERK5-XMD8-9215 and the DCLK1-XMD8-85 cocrystal structures revealed that the R4 methyl group is oriented toward the gatekeeper residue (Supporting Information Figure 1). Therefore, we hypothesized that varying the R4 group may lead to improved selectivity against ERK5.” to: “Having failed to improve the selectivity via substitution of R2 or R3, we turned to exploration of the R4 group. DCLK1 and LRRK2 possess a methionine gatekeeper residue (Met465 and Met1947, respectively), unlike ERK5, which has a leucine gatekeeper (Leu137). Examination of the ERK5-XMD8-9215 and the DCLK1-XMD8-85 cocrystal structures (Personal Communication, O. Patel & I. Lucet) revealed that the R4 methyl group is oriented toward the gatekeeper residue (Supporting Information Figure 1). Therefore, we hypothesized that varying the R4 group may lead to improved selectivity against ERK5.”
AB - Page from: 7819. Column 1, paragraph 3 should be corrected “Having failed to improve the selectivity via substitution of R2 or R3, we turned to exploration of the R4 group. DCLK1 and LRRK2 possess a methionine gatekeeper residue (Met465 and Met1947, respectively), unlike ERK5, which has a leucine gatekeeper (Leu137). Examination of the ERK5-XMD8-9215 and the DCLK1-XMD8-85 cocrystal structures revealed that the R4 methyl group is oriented toward the gatekeeper residue (Supporting Information Figure 1). Therefore, we hypothesized that varying the R4 group may lead to improved selectivity against ERK5.” to: “Having failed to improve the selectivity via substitution of R2 or R3, we turned to exploration of the R4 group. DCLK1 and LRRK2 possess a methionine gatekeeper residue (Met465 and Met1947, respectively), unlike ERK5, which has a leucine gatekeeper (Leu137). Examination of the ERK5-XMD8-9215 and the DCLK1-XMD8-85 cocrystal structures (Personal Communication, O. Patel & I. Lucet) revealed that the R4 methyl group is oriented toward the gatekeeper residue (Supporting Information Figure 1). Therefore, we hypothesized that varying the R4 group may lead to improved selectivity against ERK5.”
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090869834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090869834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01338
DO - 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01338
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 32790356
AN - SCOPUS:85090869834
SN - 0022-2623
VL - 63
SP - 10088
JO - Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
JF - Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
IS - 17
ER -