Corporeal perforation or undersized prosthesis? The role of corpus cavernosum endoscopy

D. L. Weese; P. E. Zimmern

doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39563-0

Corporeal perforation or undersized prosthesis? The role of corpus cavernosum endoscopy

D. L. Weese, P. E. Zimmern

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

At the time of revision for a unilaterally short penile prosthesis it sometimes is difficult to differentiate between an originally undersized implant and a proximal corporeal perforation. Intraoperative inspection of the corpus cavernosum with a cystoscope was performed in 2 instances and appears to be a simple diagnostic method to differentiate a proximal corporeal perforation from and undersizing of unequal corporeal bodies.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	714-715
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Urology
Volume	144
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39563-0
State	Published - 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Urology

Access to Document

10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39563-0

Cite this

@article{d6cfed89636041b8b0e675111aef8eb5,

title = "Corporeal perforation or undersized prosthesis? The role of corpus cavernosum endoscopy",

abstract = "At the time of revision for a unilaterally short penile prosthesis it sometimes is difficult to differentiate between an originally undersized implant and a proximal corporeal perforation. Intraoperative inspection of the corpus cavernosum with a cystoscope was performed in 2 instances and appears to be a simple diagnostic method to differentiate a proximal corporeal perforation from and undersizing of unequal corporeal bodies.",

author = "Weese, {D. L.} and Zimmern, {P. E.}",

year = "1990",

doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39563-0",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "144",

pages = "714--715",

journal = "Journal of Urology",

issn = "0022-5347",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corporeal perforation or undersized prosthesis? The role of corpus cavernosum endoscopy

AU - Weese, D. L.

AU - Zimmern, P. E.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - At the time of revision for a unilaterally short penile prosthesis it sometimes is difficult to differentiate between an originally undersized implant and a proximal corporeal perforation. Intraoperative inspection of the corpus cavernosum with a cystoscope was performed in 2 instances and appears to be a simple diagnostic method to differentiate a proximal corporeal perforation from and undersizing of unequal corporeal bodies.

AB - At the time of revision for a unilaterally short penile prosthesis it sometimes is difficult to differentiate between an originally undersized implant and a proximal corporeal perforation. Intraoperative inspection of the corpus cavernosum with a cystoscope was performed in 2 instances and appears to be a simple diagnostic method to differentiate a proximal corporeal perforation from and undersizing of unequal corporeal bodies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025161724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025161724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39563-0

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39563-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 2388334

AN - SCOPUS:0025161724

SN - 0022-5347

VL - 144

SP - 714

EP - 715

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

IS - 3

ER -

Corporeal perforation or undersized prosthesis? The role of corpus cavernosum endoscopy

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this