TY - JOUR
T1 - Coordinating virus research
T2 - The Virus Infectious Disease Ontology
AU - Beverley, John
AU - Babcock, Shane
AU - Carvalho, Gustavo
AU - Cowell, Lindsay G.
AU - Duesing, Sebastian
AU - He, Yongqun
AU - Hurley, Regina
AU - Merrell, Eric
AU - Scheuermann, Richard H.
AU - Smith, Barry
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Beverley et al.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - The COVID-19 pandemic prompted immense work on the investigation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Rapid, accurate, and consistent interpretation of generated data is thereby of fundamental concern. Ontologies–structured, controlled, vocabularies–are designed to support consistency of interpretation, and thereby to prevent the development of data silos. This paper describes how ontologies are serving this purpose in the COVID-19 research domain, by following principles of the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology (OBO) Foundry and by reusing existing ontologies such as the Infectious Disease Ontology (IDO) Core, which provides terminological content common to investigations of all infectious diseases. We report here on the development of an IDO extension, the Virus Infectious Disease Ontology (VIDO), a reference ontology covering viral infectious diseases. We motivate term and definition choices, showcase reuse of terms from existing OBO ontologies, illustrate how ontological decisions were motivated by relevant life science research, and connect VIDO to the Coronavirus Infectious Disease Ontology (CIDO). We next use terms from these ontologies to annotate selections from life science research on SARS-CoV-2, highlighting how ontologies employing a common upper-level vocabulary may be seamlessly interwoven. Finally, we outline future work, including bacteria and fungus infectious disease reference ontologies currently under development, then cite uses of VIDO and CIDO in host-pathogen data analytics, electronic health record annotation, and ontology conflict-resolution projects.
AB - The COVID-19 pandemic prompted immense work on the investigation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Rapid, accurate, and consistent interpretation of generated data is thereby of fundamental concern. Ontologies–structured, controlled, vocabularies–are designed to support consistency of interpretation, and thereby to prevent the development of data silos. This paper describes how ontologies are serving this purpose in the COVID-19 research domain, by following principles of the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology (OBO) Foundry and by reusing existing ontologies such as the Infectious Disease Ontology (IDO) Core, which provides terminological content common to investigations of all infectious diseases. We report here on the development of an IDO extension, the Virus Infectious Disease Ontology (VIDO), a reference ontology covering viral infectious diseases. We motivate term and definition choices, showcase reuse of terms from existing OBO ontologies, illustrate how ontological decisions were motivated by relevant life science research, and connect VIDO to the Coronavirus Infectious Disease Ontology (CIDO). We next use terms from these ontologies to annotate selections from life science research on SARS-CoV-2, highlighting how ontologies employing a common upper-level vocabulary may be seamlessly interwoven. Finally, we outline future work, including bacteria and fungus infectious disease reference ontologies currently under development, then cite uses of VIDO and CIDO in host-pathogen data analytics, electronic health record annotation, and ontology conflict-resolution projects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182772490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85182772490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0285093
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0285093
M3 - Article
C2 - 38236918
AN - SCOPUS:85182772490
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 19
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 1 January
M1 - e0285093
ER -