TY - JOUR
T1 - Comprehensive proficiency-Based inanimate training for robotic surgery
T2 - Reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit
AU - Arain, Nabeel A.
AU - Dulan, Genevieve
AU - Hogg, Deborah C.
AU - Rege, Robert V
AU - Powers, Cathryn E.
AU - Tesfay, Seifu T.
AU - Hynan, Linda S
AU - Scott, Daniel J
PY - 2012/10
Y1 - 2012/10
N2 - Background: We previously developed a comprehensive proficiency-based robotic training curriculum demonstrating construct, content, and face validity. This study aimed to assess reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit associated with curricular implementation. Methods: Over an 11-month period, 55 residents, fellows, and faculty (robotic novices) from general surgery, urology, and gynecology were enrolled in a 2-month curriculum: online didactics, half-day hands-on tutorial, and self-practice using nine inanimate exercises. Each trainee completed a questionnaire and performed a single proctored repetition of each task before (pretest) and after (posttest) training. Tasks were scored for time and errors using modified FLS metrics. For inter-rater reliability (IRR), three trainees were scored by two raters and analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Data from eight experts were analyzed using ICC and Cronbach's a to determine test-retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively. Educational benefit was assessed by comparing baseline (pretest) and final (post-test) trainee performance; comparisons used Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Of the 55 trainees that pretested, 53 (96 %) completed all curricular components in 9-17 h and reached proficiency after completing an average of 72 ± 28 repetitions over 5 ± 1 h. Trainees indicated minimal prior robotic experience and "poor comfort" with robotic skills at baseline (1.8 ± 0.9) compared to final testing (3.1 ± 0.8, p<0.001). IRR data for the composite score revealed an ICC of 0.96 (p<0.001). Test-retest reliability was 0.91 (p<0.001) and internal consistency was 0.81. Performance improved significantly after training for all nine tasks and according to composite scores (548 ± 176 vs. 914 ± 81, p<0.001), demonstrating educational benefit. Conclusion: This curriculum is associated with high reliability measures, demonstrated feasibility for a large cohort of trainees, and yielded significant educational benefit. Further studies and adoption of this curriculum are encouraged.
AB - Background: We previously developed a comprehensive proficiency-based robotic training curriculum demonstrating construct, content, and face validity. This study aimed to assess reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit associated with curricular implementation. Methods: Over an 11-month period, 55 residents, fellows, and faculty (robotic novices) from general surgery, urology, and gynecology were enrolled in a 2-month curriculum: online didactics, half-day hands-on tutorial, and self-practice using nine inanimate exercises. Each trainee completed a questionnaire and performed a single proctored repetition of each task before (pretest) and after (posttest) training. Tasks were scored for time and errors using modified FLS metrics. For inter-rater reliability (IRR), three trainees were scored by two raters and analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Data from eight experts were analyzed using ICC and Cronbach's a to determine test-retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively. Educational benefit was assessed by comparing baseline (pretest) and final (post-test) trainee performance; comparisons used Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Of the 55 trainees that pretested, 53 (96 %) completed all curricular components in 9-17 h and reached proficiency after completing an average of 72 ± 28 repetitions over 5 ± 1 h. Trainees indicated minimal prior robotic experience and "poor comfort" with robotic skills at baseline (1.8 ± 0.9) compared to final testing (3.1 ± 0.8, p<0.001). IRR data for the composite score revealed an ICC of 0.96 (p<0.001). Test-retest reliability was 0.91 (p<0.001) and internal consistency was 0.81. Performance improved significantly after training for all nine tasks and according to composite scores (548 ± 176 vs. 914 ± 81, p<0.001), demonstrating educational benefit. Conclusion: This curriculum is associated with high reliability measures, demonstrated feasibility for a large cohort of trainees, and yielded significant educational benefit. Further studies and adoption of this curriculum are encouraged.
KW - Curriculum development and implementation
KW - Proficiency-based training
KW - Reliability
KW - Robotic skills training
KW - Robotic surgery
KW - Simulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871617697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871617697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-012-2264-x
DO - 10.1007/s00464-012-2264-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 22538678
AN - SCOPUS:84871617697
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 26
SP - 2740
EP - 2745
JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
IS - 10
ER -