TY - JOUR
T1 - Complex Lower Extremity Wound in the Complex Host
T2 - Results from a Multicenter Registry
AU - Kim, Paul J.
AU - Attinger, Christopher E.
AU - Orgill, Dennis
AU - Galiano, Robert D.
AU - Steinberg, John S.
AU - Evans, Karen K.
AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the *Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.; †Department of Plastic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.; ‡Division of Plastic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass.; §Department of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.; and ¶Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex. Received for publication October 5, 2018; accepted December 12,2018. Supported by Integra LifeSciences Inc. (Plainsboro, NJ). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board Georgetown University Medical Center (Washington, D.C.), Partners Human Research Committee (Boston, Mass.), University of Texas Southwestern (Dallas, Tex.), and Northwestern University (Chicago, Ill.). All study data material on file with Integra LifeSciences Inc. Clinical Trials.gov: Retrospective Study Evaluating Outcomes for Integra Skin Sheets in Lower Extremity Complex Wounds; NCT01947387; Date Registered: August 12, 2013.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 The Authors.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - Background: The complex diabetic lower extremity wound has not been well studied. There are a variety of new technologies now being applied with a paucity of evidence in evaluating their outcomes. The aim of this study is to describe clinical outcomes in the complex lower extremity wound in the comorbid host. We hypothesized that treatment choice would have minimal impact on healing outcomes in this compromised population. Methods: A multicenter retrospective registry of patients with diabetes and lower extremity wounds was created to compare treatment modalities of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold, negative-pressure wound therapy, local tissue flap, and free tissue transfer. Statistical analyses included descriptive, proportional comparisons and Cox regression. Results: There were no statistical differences in age, hemoglobin A1c, or body mass index between groups. Study patients had a history of amputation (40.5%), peripheral vascular disease (54.6%), peripheral neuropathy (64.8%), end-stage renal disease (13.9%), renal/hepatic disease (40.4%), and hypertension (85%). The most common wound etiologies were surgical dehiscence (69%), diabetic neuropathic wounds (39%), and ischemic wounds (28%), most commonly located on the foot or at a prior amputation site (30%). Mean wound area was 57.9 cm2 and almost half with exposed bone. There were no statistical differences between treatment groups in proportion or time to healing, recurrence, or time to return to baseline function. Conclusions: Commonly used treatment modalities employed for this population of patients resulted in similar outcomes. This is the first study to describe the complex diabetic lower extremity wound in a complex host.
AB - Background: The complex diabetic lower extremity wound has not been well studied. There are a variety of new technologies now being applied with a paucity of evidence in evaluating their outcomes. The aim of this study is to describe clinical outcomes in the complex lower extremity wound in the comorbid host. We hypothesized that treatment choice would have minimal impact on healing outcomes in this compromised population. Methods: A multicenter retrospective registry of patients with diabetes and lower extremity wounds was created to compare treatment modalities of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold, negative-pressure wound therapy, local tissue flap, and free tissue transfer. Statistical analyses included descriptive, proportional comparisons and Cox regression. Results: There were no statistical differences in age, hemoglobin A1c, or body mass index between groups. Study patients had a history of amputation (40.5%), peripheral vascular disease (54.6%), peripheral neuropathy (64.8%), end-stage renal disease (13.9%), renal/hepatic disease (40.4%), and hypertension (85%). The most common wound etiologies were surgical dehiscence (69%), diabetic neuropathic wounds (39%), and ischemic wounds (28%), most commonly located on the foot or at a prior amputation site (30%). Mean wound area was 57.9 cm2 and almost half with exposed bone. There were no statistical differences between treatment groups in proportion or time to healing, recurrence, or time to return to baseline function. Conclusions: Commonly used treatment modalities employed for this population of patients resulted in similar outcomes. This is the first study to describe the complex diabetic lower extremity wound in a complex host.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073498424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073498424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002129
DO - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002129
M3 - Article
C2 - 31321165
AN - SCOPUS:85073498424
SN - 2169-7574
VL - 7
JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
IS - 4
M1 - e2129
ER -