Comparing two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT

Marianne Starlander; Pierrette Bouillon; Glenn Flores; Manny Rayner; Nikos Tsourakis

Comparing two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT

Marianne Starlander, Pierrette Bouillon, Glenn Flores, Manny Rayner, Nikos Tsourakis

Pediatrics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

This paper reports preliminary results of an evaluation during which two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT were compared in a hospital setting. The more restricted version (V.1) only allows Yes-No answers and short elliptical sentences, while the less restricted version (V.2) allows Yes-No answers, short elliptical sentences and full sentences. Although WER is marginally better for V.1, task performance is marginally worse. There appear to be two main reasons for this disparity; short sentences are often badly recognised and patients tend to find it difficult to limit themselves to ellipsis, even if they receive clear instructions about not using full sentences.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008
Pages	176-181
Number of pages	6
State	Published - Dec 1 2008
Event	12th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, EAMT 2008 - Hamburg, Germany Duration: Sep 22 2008 → Sep 23 2008

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008

Other

Other	12th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, EAMT 2008
Country/Territory	Germany
City	Hamburg
Period	9/22/08 → 9/23/08

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Language and Linguistics
Human-Computer Interaction
Software

Cite this

Starlander, M., Bouillon, P., Flores, G., Rayner, M., & Tsourakis, N. (2008). Comparing two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT. In Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008 (pp. 176-181). (Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008).

Comparing two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT. / Starlander, Marianne; Bouillon, Pierrette; Flores, Glenn et al.

Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008. 2008. p. 176-181 (Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Starlander, M, Bouillon, P, Flores, G, Rayner, M & Tsourakis, N 2008, Comparing two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT. in Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008. Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008, pp. 176-181, 12th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, EAMT 2008, Hamburg, Germany, 9/22/08.

Starlander M, Bouillon P, Flores G, Rayner M, Tsourakis N. Comparing two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT. In Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008. 2008. p. 176-181. (Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008).

Starlander, Marianne ; Bouillon, Pierrette ; Flores, Glenn et al. / Comparing two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT. Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008. 2008. pp. 176-181 (Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008).

@inproceedings{f7d32e37347f44ba922d4984833ba487,

title = "Comparing two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT",

abstract = "This paper reports preliminary results of an evaluation during which two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT were compared in a hospital setting. The more restricted version (V.1) only allows Yes-No answers and short elliptical sentences, while the less restricted version (V.2) allows Yes-No answers, short elliptical sentences and full sentences. Although WER is marginally better for V.1, task performance is marginally worse. There appear to be two main reasons for this disparity; short sentences are often badly recognised and patients tend to find it difficult to limit themselves to ellipsis, even if they receive clear instructions about not using full sentences.",

author = "Marianne Starlander and Pierrette Bouillon and Glenn Flores and Manny Rayner and Nikos Tsourakis",

year = "2008",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9783000257704",

series = "Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008",

pages = "176--181",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008",

note = "12th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, EAMT 2008 ; Conference date: 22-09-2008 Through 23-09-2008",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparing two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT

AU - Starlander, Marianne

AU - Bouillon, Pierrette

AU - Flores, Glenn

AU - Rayner, Manny

AU - Tsourakis, Nikos

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - This paper reports preliminary results of an evaluation during which two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT were compared in a hospital setting. The more restricted version (V.1) only allows Yes-No answers and short elliptical sentences, while the less restricted version (V.2) allows Yes-No answers, short elliptical sentences and full sentences. Although WER is marginally better for V.1, task performance is marginally worse. There appear to be two main reasons for this disparity; short sentences are often badly recognised and patients tend to find it difficult to limit themselves to ellipsis, even if they receive clear instructions about not using full sentences.

AB - This paper reports preliminary results of an evaluation during which two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT were compared in a hospital setting. The more restricted version (V.1) only allows Yes-No answers and short elliptical sentences, while the less restricted version (V.2) allows Yes-No answers, short elliptical sentences and full sentences. Although WER is marginally better for V.1, task performance is marginally worse. There appear to be two main reasons for this disparity; short sentences are often badly recognised and patients tend to find it difficult to limit themselves to ellipsis, even if they receive clear instructions about not using full sentences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857591361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857591361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84857591361

SN - 9783000257704

T3 - Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008

SP - 176

EP - 181

BT - Proceedings of the 12th European Association for Machine Translation Conference, EAMT 2008

T2 - 12th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, EAMT 2008

Y2 - 22 September 2008 through 23 September 2008

ER -

Comparing two different bidirectional versions of the limited-domain medical spoken language translator MedSLT

Abstract

Publication series

Other

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this