Cognitive, mood, and electroencephalographic effects of noninvasive cortical stimulation with weak electrical currents

Laura Tadini, Rasheda El-Nazer, Andre Russowsky Brunoni, Julie Williams, Marcelo Carvas, Paulo Boggio, Alberto Priori, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Felipe Fregni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The use of noninvasive cortical electrical stimulation with weak currents has significantly increased in basic and clinical human studies. Initial, preliminary studies with this technique have shown encouraging results; however, the safety and tolerability of this method of brain stimulation have not been sufficiently explored yet. The purpose of our study was to assess the effects of direct current (DC) and alternating current (AC) stimulation at different intensities in order to measure their effects on cognition, mood, and electroencephalogram. METHODS: Eighty-two healthy, right-handed subjects received active and sham stimulation in a randomized order. We conducted 164 ninety-minute sessions of electrical stimulation in 4 different protocols to assess safety of (1) anodal DC of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC); (2) cathodal DC of the DLPFC; (3) intermittent anodal DC of the DLPFC and; (4) AC on the zygomatic process. We used weak currents of 1 to 2 mA (for DC experiments) or 0.1 to 0.2 mA (for AC experiment). RESULTS: We found no significant changes in electroencephalogram, cognition, mood, and pain between groups and a low prevalence of mild adverse effects (0.11% and 0.08% in the active and sham stimulation groups, respectively), mainly, sleepiness and mild headache that were equally distributed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we show no neurophysiological or behavioral signs that transcranial DC stimulation or AC stimulation with weak currents induce deleterious changes when comparing active and sham groups. This study provides therefore additional information for researchers and ethics committees, adding important results to the safety pool of studies assessing the effects of cortical stimulation using weak electrical currents. Further studies in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders are warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)134-140
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of ECT
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adverse effects
  • brain stimulation
  • safety
  • transcranial direct current stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive, mood, and electroencephalographic effects of noninvasive cortical stimulation with weak electrical currents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this