TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive Assessment via Telephone
T2 - A Scoping Review of Instruments
AU - Carlew, Anne R.
AU - Fatima, Hudaisa
AU - Livingstone, Julia R.
AU - Reese, Caitlin
AU - Lacritz, Laura
AU - Pendergrass, Cody
AU - Bailey, Kenneth Chase
AU - Presley, Chase
AU - Mokhtari, Ben
AU - Cullum, Colin Munro
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by funding provided in part by BvB Dallas Foundation Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropsychology Fellowship (A.R.C.) and the O’Donnell Brain Institute Cognition and Memory Center (A.R.C., L.L., C.M.C.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Objective: Telephone-based cognitive assessment (TBCA) has long been studied but less widely adopted in routine neuropsychological practice. Increased interest in remote neuropsychological assessment techniques in the face of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic warrants an updated review of relevant remote assessment literature. While recent reviews of videoconference-based neuropsychological applications have been published, no updated compilation of empirical TBCA research has been completed. Therefore, this scoping review offers relevant empirical research to inform clinical decision-making specific to teleneuropsychology. Method: Peer-reviewed studies addressing TBCA were included. Broad search terms were related to telephone, cognitive, or neuropsychological assessment and screening. After systematic searching of the PubMed and EBSCO databases, 139 relevant articles were retained. Results: In total, 17 unique cognitive screening measures, 20 cognitive batteries, and 6 single-task measures were identified as being developed or adapted specifically for telephone administration. Tables summarizing the identified cognitive assessments, information on diagnostic accuracy, and comparisons to face-to-face cognitive assessment are included in supplementary materials. Conclusions: Overall, literature suggests that TBCA is a viable modality for identifying cognitive impairment in various populations. However, the mode of assessment selected clinically should reflect an understanding of the purpose, evidence, and limitations for various tests and populations. Most identified measures were developed for research application to support gross cognitive characterization and to help determine when more comprehensive testing was needed. While TBCA is not meant to replace gold-standard, face-to-face evaluation, if appropriately utilized, it can expand scope of practice, particularly when barriers to standard neuropsychological assessment occur.
AB - Objective: Telephone-based cognitive assessment (TBCA) has long been studied but less widely adopted in routine neuropsychological practice. Increased interest in remote neuropsychological assessment techniques in the face of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic warrants an updated review of relevant remote assessment literature. While recent reviews of videoconference-based neuropsychological applications have been published, no updated compilation of empirical TBCA research has been completed. Therefore, this scoping review offers relevant empirical research to inform clinical decision-making specific to teleneuropsychology. Method: Peer-reviewed studies addressing TBCA were included. Broad search terms were related to telephone, cognitive, or neuropsychological assessment and screening. After systematic searching of the PubMed and EBSCO databases, 139 relevant articles were retained. Results: In total, 17 unique cognitive screening measures, 20 cognitive batteries, and 6 single-task measures were identified as being developed or adapted specifically for telephone administration. Tables summarizing the identified cognitive assessments, information on diagnostic accuracy, and comparisons to face-to-face cognitive assessment are included in supplementary materials. Conclusions: Overall, literature suggests that TBCA is a viable modality for identifying cognitive impairment in various populations. However, the mode of assessment selected clinically should reflect an understanding of the purpose, evidence, and limitations for various tests and populations. Most identified measures were developed for research application to support gross cognitive characterization and to help determine when more comprehensive testing was needed. While TBCA is not meant to replace gold-standard, face-to-face evaluation, if appropriately utilized, it can expand scope of practice, particularly when barriers to standard neuropsychological assessment occur.
KW - Cognitive assessment
KW - Neuropsychological assessment
KW - Telehealth
KW - Teleneuropsychology
KW - Telephone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096456997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096456997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/arclin/acaa096
DO - 10.1093/arclin/acaa096
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33106856
AN - SCOPUS:85096456997
SN - 0887-6177
VL - 35
SP - 1215
EP - 1233
JO - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
JF - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
IS - 8
ER -