TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges and outcomes of the double kissing crush stenting technique
T2 - Insights from the PROGRESS-BIFURCATION registry
AU - Simsek, Bahadir
AU - Kostantinis, Spyridon
AU - Karacsonyi, Judit
AU - Vemmou, Evangelia
AU - Nikolakopoulos, Ilias
AU - Assali, Maen
AU - Burke, M. Nicholas
AU - Garcia, Santiago
AU - Wang, Yale
AU - Chavez, Ivan
AU - Goessl, Mario
AU - Sorajja, Paul
AU - Mooney, Michael
AU - Poulose, Anil
AU - Traverse, Jay
AU - Rangan, Bavana V.
AU - Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: Although the double kissing (DK) crush stenting technique can provide excellent outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions, it can be challenging to perform. Methods: We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics, challenges encountered, and procedural outcomes of bifurcation PCI with DK crush in Prospective Global Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Bifurcation Lesions (PROGRESS-BIFURCATION, NCT05100992). Results: DK crush was used in 48 of 435 bifurcation lesions (11%). Technical success was 100%, procedural success was 96%, and the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events was 4%. Challenges while performing DK crush were encountered in 26 lesions (54%): (1) difficulty in side branch (SB) first rewiring (38%) that was overcome with the use of a new guidewire (30%) or a microcatheter (15%); (2) inability to deliver balloon to an SB for the first kiss (54%) that was overcome with the use of a smaller balloon (86%), rewiring (29%), microcatheter (14%), and increased support 7%; (3) difficulty in SB second rewiring (19%) that was overcome with the use of a new guidewire (80%) and/or microcatheter (60%). DK crush was more often performed in left main and proximal left anterior descending artery lesions (70% vs. 50%, p = 0.014). DK crush cases required more contrast (198 ± 84 ml vs. 163 ± 70 ml, p = 0.003), fluoroscopy time (35 ± 20 min vs. 25 ± 21 min, p = 0.004), and lasted longer (137 ± 69 min vs. 99 ± 66 min, p = 0.001) compared with non-DK crush techniques. Conclusions: While challenges are common when performing DK crush bifurcation stenting, success rates are high and complication rates are low.
AB - Background: Although the double kissing (DK) crush stenting technique can provide excellent outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions, it can be challenging to perform. Methods: We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics, challenges encountered, and procedural outcomes of bifurcation PCI with DK crush in Prospective Global Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Bifurcation Lesions (PROGRESS-BIFURCATION, NCT05100992). Results: DK crush was used in 48 of 435 bifurcation lesions (11%). Technical success was 100%, procedural success was 96%, and the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events was 4%. Challenges while performing DK crush were encountered in 26 lesions (54%): (1) difficulty in side branch (SB) first rewiring (38%) that was overcome with the use of a new guidewire (30%) or a microcatheter (15%); (2) inability to deliver balloon to an SB for the first kiss (54%) that was overcome with the use of a smaller balloon (86%), rewiring (29%), microcatheter (14%), and increased support 7%; (3) difficulty in SB second rewiring (19%) that was overcome with the use of a new guidewire (80%) and/or microcatheter (60%). DK crush was more often performed in left main and proximal left anterior descending artery lesions (70% vs. 50%, p = 0.014). DK crush cases required more contrast (198 ± 84 ml vs. 163 ± 70 ml, p = 0.003), fluoroscopy time (35 ± 20 min vs. 25 ± 21 min, p = 0.004), and lasted longer (137 ± 69 min vs. 99 ± 66 min, p = 0.001) compared with non-DK crush techniques. Conclusions: While challenges are common when performing DK crush bifurcation stenting, success rates are high and complication rates are low.
KW - DK crush
KW - bifurcation PCI
KW - complex PCI
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125809288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125809288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ccd.30135
DO - 10.1002/ccd.30135
M3 - Article
C2 - 35195331
AN - SCOPUS:85125809288
SN - 1522-1946
JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
ER -