Cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation: comparison of the Belscope and Macintosh blades

N. M. Gajraj, D. P. Chason, V. E. Shearer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the degree of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation using the Belscope and Macintosh laryngoscope blades. Twenty ASA 1 and 2 patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation were studied. Following induction of anaesthesia and muscle relaxation, a neutral cross‐table lateral cervical spine X ray was taken. Laryngoscopy was then performed in each patient using both the Belscope and Macintosh blades. After visualisation of the vocal cords and tracheal intubation the cervical spine X ray was repeated. Movement of the cervical spine was evaluated by tracing bony landmarks on each film and then superimposing the neutral and intubating films. We were unable to demonstrate a difference in the amount of cervical spine movement comparing the two blades. Using the Belscope blade, intubation took longer (median 18 s) than the Macintosh blade (median 12 s, p < 0.01) and was unsuccessful in two patients despite adequate visualisation of the vocal cords.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)772-774
Number of pages3
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume49
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1994

Keywords

  • Intubation
  • cervical spine
  • laryngoscopes. Anatomy
  • tracheal. Equipment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation: comparison of the Belscope and Macintosh blades'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this