TY - JOUR
T1 - Bringing PERT to Pediatrics
T2 - Initial Experience and Outcomes of a Pediatric Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT)
AU - Dang, Mary P.
AU - Cheng, Anna
AU - Garcia, Jessica
AU - Lee, Ying
AU - Parikh, Mihir
AU - McMichael, Ali B.V.
AU - Han, Brian L.
AU - Pimpalwar, Sheena
AU - Rinzler, Elliot S.
AU - Hoffman, Olivia L.
AU - Baltagi, Sirine A.
AU - Bowens, Cindy
AU - Divekar, Abhay A.
AU - Davis Volk, A. Paige
AU - Huang, Craig J.
AU - Veeram Reddy, Surendranath R.
AU - Arar, Yousef
AU - Zia, Ayesha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American College of Chest Physicians
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Background: Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) streamline care of adults with life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Given rarity of pediatric PE, developing a clinical, educational, and research PERT paradigm is a novel and underused concept in pediatrics. Research Question: Is a PERT feasible in pediatrics, and does it improve PE care? Study Design and Methods: A strategy-to-execution proposal to launch a pediatric PERT was developed for institutional buy-in. Key stakeholders collectively implemented the PERT. Data were collected for the 2-year pre-PERT and post-PERT eras, and outcomes were compared. Results: PERT implementation took 12 months. Our PERT, led by hematology, is composed of pediatric experts in emergency medicine, critical care, interventional cardiology, anesthesiology, and interventional radiology. Data on 30 patients pre-PERT and 31 patients post-PERT were analyzed. Pre-PERT, 10% (3 of 30), 13% (4 of 30), 20% (6 of 30), and 57% (17 of 30), and post-PERT, 3% (1 of 31), 10% (3 of 31), 16% (5 of 31), and 71% (22 of 31) were categorized as high-risk, intermediate-low-risk, intermediate-high-risk, and low-risk PE, respectively. Post-PERT, there were 13 unique PERT activations. PERT was activated on all eligible patients with PE and, additionally, on four low-risk PEs. Time to echocardiogram was shorter post-PERT (4.7 vs 2 hours; P =.0147). Anticoagulation was ordered (90 vs 54 min; P =.003) and given sooner (154 vs 113 min; P =.049) post-PERT. There were no differences in time to reperfusion therapies (12 hours pre-PERT vs 8.7 hours post-PERT, P =.10). Five of six (83.3%) eligible (intermediate-high and high-risk) patients received reperfusion therapies in the post-PERT era compared to three of eight (37.5%) eligible patients in the pre-PERT era (P =.0001). There were no differences in major bleeding, mortality, or length of stay in either era. Interpretation: The pediatric PERT paradigm was successfully created and adopted locally. Our PERT enhanced access to experts, facilitated timely advanced therapies, and held value for low-risk PE. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center pediatric PERT may serve as a best practice model for streamlining care for pediatric PE.
AB - Background: Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) streamline care of adults with life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Given rarity of pediatric PE, developing a clinical, educational, and research PERT paradigm is a novel and underused concept in pediatrics. Research Question: Is a PERT feasible in pediatrics, and does it improve PE care? Study Design and Methods: A strategy-to-execution proposal to launch a pediatric PERT was developed for institutional buy-in. Key stakeholders collectively implemented the PERT. Data were collected for the 2-year pre-PERT and post-PERT eras, and outcomes were compared. Results: PERT implementation took 12 months. Our PERT, led by hematology, is composed of pediatric experts in emergency medicine, critical care, interventional cardiology, anesthesiology, and interventional radiology. Data on 30 patients pre-PERT and 31 patients post-PERT were analyzed. Pre-PERT, 10% (3 of 30), 13% (4 of 30), 20% (6 of 30), and 57% (17 of 30), and post-PERT, 3% (1 of 31), 10% (3 of 31), 16% (5 of 31), and 71% (22 of 31) were categorized as high-risk, intermediate-low-risk, intermediate-high-risk, and low-risk PE, respectively. Post-PERT, there were 13 unique PERT activations. PERT was activated on all eligible patients with PE and, additionally, on four low-risk PEs. Time to echocardiogram was shorter post-PERT (4.7 vs 2 hours; P =.0147). Anticoagulation was ordered (90 vs 54 min; P =.003) and given sooner (154 vs 113 min; P =.049) post-PERT. There were no differences in time to reperfusion therapies (12 hours pre-PERT vs 8.7 hours post-PERT, P =.10). Five of six (83.3%) eligible (intermediate-high and high-risk) patients received reperfusion therapies in the post-PERT era compared to three of eight (37.5%) eligible patients in the pre-PERT era (P =.0001). There were no differences in major bleeding, mortality, or length of stay in either era. Interpretation: The pediatric PERT paradigm was successfully created and adopted locally. Our PERT enhanced access to experts, facilitated timely advanced therapies, and held value for low-risk PE. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center pediatric PERT may serve as a best practice model for streamlining care for pediatric PE.
KW - PERT
KW - catheter-directed thrombolysis
KW - pediatric pulmonary embolism
KW - pediatrics
KW - pulmonary embolism
KW - pulmonary embolism response team
KW - reperfusion therapies
KW - venous thromboembolism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216120811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85216120811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2024.09.028
DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2024.09.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 39368735
AN - SCOPUS:85216120811
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 167
SP - 851
EP - 862
JO - CHEST
JF - CHEST
IS - 3
ER -