Bone mineral density screening by DXA for people with cystic fibrosis: A registry analysis of patient and program factors influencing rates of screening

Gregory A. Ratti, Gabriela S. Fernandez, Michael S. Schechter, Michael S. Stalvey, Josh Ostrenga, Aliza K. Fink, Raksha Jain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Background: Current guidelines recommend screening for Cystic Fibrosis (CF) related bone disease (CFBD) using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for all people ≥ 18 years of age and select people ≥ 8 years of age. However, adherence to these guidelines is variable. This study aims to evaluate screening practices among adult programs in the US and identify patient and program-based characteristics which may influence screening. Methods: The CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) was used to identify all people over the age of 18 who were seen at adult CF programs and received screening for CFBD using DXA at least once between 2014 and 2018. Associations with patient and program level characteristics were assessed using the Chi Square test. Patient level variables were also examined using standardized difference to assess for meaningful clinical differences in rates of screening. Results: From 2014 to 2018, a total of 15,134 people over the age of 18 were identified in the CFFPR. Of these people, 9,023 (60%) received a DXA during the time period. The median rate of screening by program was 66% and programs in the highest quartile of screening obtained DXAs on >76% of their population. At the program level, larger size and increased adherence to other guideline practices such as OGTT screening and 4 visits, 4 cultures in a year correlated with higher rates of screening for CFBD. At the patient-level, people with lower lung function (FEV1 <90%) and those with CF related diabetes were more likely to be screened. People without health insurance were less likely to receive recommended screening. Conclusion: Screening practices for CFBD vary widely across adult programs in the US despite recommendations to screen all people over the age of 18. Factors identified in this analysis may be used to identify those people at highest risk of missing appropriate screening. CFBD has significant implications for our patients and therefore routine screening should be emphasized as part of standard care moving forward.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Cystic Fibrosis
StateAccepted/In press - 2022


  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Cystic fibrosis related bone disease
  • DEXA scan
  • Osteopenia
  • Osteoporosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Bone mineral density screening by DXA for people with cystic fibrosis: A registry analysis of patient and program factors influencing rates of screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this