TY - JOUR
T1 - Barriers to cognitive behavioral therapy homework completion scale-depression version
T2 - Development and psychometric evaluation
AU - Callan, Judith A.
AU - Dunbar-Jacob, Jacqueline
AU - Sereika, Susan M.
AU - Stone, Clement
AU - Fasiczka, Amy
AU - Jarrett, Robin B.
AU - Thase, Michael E.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - We conducted a two-phase study to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of an instrument to identify barriers to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) homework completion in a depressed sample. In Phase I, we developed an item pool by interviewing 20 depressed patients and 20 CBT therapists. In Phase II, we created and administered a draft instrument to 56 people with depression. Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a two-factor oblique solution of "Patient Factors" and "Therapy/Task Factors." Internal consistency coefficients ranged from .80 to .95. Temporal stability was demonstrated through Pearson correlations of.72 (for the therapist/task subscale) to.95 (for the patient subscale) over periods of time that ranged from 2 days to 3 weeks. The patient subscale was able to satisfactorily classify patients (75% to 79%) with low and high adherence at both sessions. Specificity was.66 at both time points. Sensitivity was.80 at session B and.77 at session C. There were no consistent predictors of assignment compliance when measured by the Assignment Compliance Rating Scale (ACRS; Primakoff, Epstein, & Covi, 1986). The Rating Scale and subscale scores did, however, correlate significantly with assignment noncompliance.
AB - We conducted a two-phase study to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of an instrument to identify barriers to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) homework completion in a depressed sample. In Phase I, we developed an item pool by interviewing 20 depressed patients and 20 CBT therapists. In Phase II, we created and administered a draft instrument to 56 people with depression. Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a two-factor oblique solution of "Patient Factors" and "Therapy/Task Factors." Internal consistency coefficients ranged from .80 to .95. Temporal stability was demonstrated through Pearson correlations of.72 (for the therapist/task subscale) to.95 (for the patient subscale) over periods of time that ranged from 2 days to 3 weeks. The patient subscale was able to satisfactorily classify patients (75% to 79%) with low and high adherence at both sessions. Specificity was.66 at both time points. Sensitivity was.80 at session B and.77 at session C. There were no consistent predictors of assignment compliance when measured by the Assignment Compliance Rating Scale (ACRS; Primakoff, Epstein, & Covi, 1986). The Rating Scale and subscale scores did, however, correlate significantly with assignment noncompliance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871461564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871461564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1521/ijct.2012.5.2.219
DO - 10.1521/ijct.2012.5.2.219
M3 - Article
C2 - 24049556
AN - SCOPUS:84871461564
SN - 1937-1209
VL - 5
SP - 219
EP - 235
JO - International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
JF - International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
IS - 2
ER -