TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing pathological Detoxification Fear among methadone maintenance patients
T2 - The DFSS
AU - Milby, J. B.
AU - Gurwitch, R. H.
AU - Hohmann, A. A.
AU - Wiebe, D. J.
PY - 1987/9
Y1 - 1987/9
N2 - This study assessed the reliability, validity, discriminative accuracy, and factor structure of the Detoxification Fear Survey Schedule (DFSS). Prevalence of detoxification fear and its correlates also were assessed. Random samples from three geographically, culturally, and racially disparate populations (N = 271) of treated opioid addicts were used. The DFSS had a test‐retest r = .935 and demonstrated several indicants of validity. A briefer version (DFSS‐14) showed superior psychometric properties and could identify correctly 81% of detox fear subjects while it excluded 55% of nonfear subjects. The DFSS‐14 had a replicated three‐factor structure that accounted for 62.1% of total item variance in the validation sample. Factor two, probably best named dose reduction fear, was replicated in all populations. A cut‐off score set at the nonfear mean is recommended for clinical use. A brief clinical interview of positive scorers quickly should eliminate false positives and, thus, efficiently identify most of those with detoxification fear.
AB - This study assessed the reliability, validity, discriminative accuracy, and factor structure of the Detoxification Fear Survey Schedule (DFSS). Prevalence of detoxification fear and its correlates also were assessed. Random samples from three geographically, culturally, and racially disparate populations (N = 271) of treated opioid addicts were used. The DFSS had a test‐retest r = .935 and demonstrated several indicants of validity. A briefer version (DFSS‐14) showed superior psychometric properties and could identify correctly 81% of detox fear subjects while it excluded 55% of nonfear subjects. The DFSS‐14 had a replicated three‐factor structure that accounted for 62.1% of total item variance in the validation sample. Factor two, probably best named dose reduction fear, was replicated in all populations. A cut‐off score set at the nonfear mean is recommended for clinical use. A brief clinical interview of positive scorers quickly should eliminate false positives and, thus, efficiently identify most of those with detoxification fear.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023232473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023232473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/1097-4679(198709)43:5<528::AID-JCLP2270430517>3.0.CO;2-2
DO - 10.1002/1097-4679(198709)43:5<528::AID-JCLP2270430517>3.0.CO;2-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 3667947
AN - SCOPUS:0023232473
SN - 0021-9762
VL - 43
SP - 528
EP - 538
JO - In Session - Psychotherapy in Practice
JF - In Session - Psychotherapy in Practice
IS - 5
ER -