TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing Extracellular Volume in Hemodialysis Patients Using Intradialytic Blood Pressure Slopes
AU - Liu, Hao
AU - Lu, Rong
AU - Shastri, Shani
AU - Sonderman, Mark
AU - Van Buren, Peter Noel
N1 - Funding Information:
Support for this study comes from NIH 1K23DK096007-01A1 Patient Oriented Career Development Award (PVB) and institutional support as the Dedman Family Scholar in Clinical Care (PVB). R.L. is supported by funding by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP150596). Research in this study was further supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institute of Health under award number UL1TR001105 and the University of Texas Southwestern O'Brien Kidney Research Core (NIH grant P30DK079328).
Funding Information:
Support for this study comes from NIH 1K23DK096007-01A1 Patient Oriented Career Development Award (PVB) and institutional support as the Dedman Family Scholar in Clinical Care (PVB). R.L. is supported by funding by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP150596). Research in this study was further supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institute of Health under award number UL1TR001105 and the University of Texas Southwestern O’Brien Kidney Research Core (NIH grant P30DK079328).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Background/Aims: Extracellular volume (ECV) overload is a mortality risk factor in hemodialysis patients, but no standard approach exists to objectively assess this clinically. We aimed to quantify relationships between slopes of repeated intradialytic blood pressure (BP) measurements and ECV. Methods: In a cross-sectional study of 71 hemodialysis patients, we calculated BP slopes from all intradialytic measurements using Gaussian regression. We measured extracellular and total body water (TBW) with bioimpedance spectroscopy. We analyzed unconditional and conditional associations between BP slope and volume metrics with mixed linear models and sensitivity analyses using non-linear intradialytic BP trajectory. Results: Mean systolic intradialytic BP slope (IBPS) was -0.06 (0.1) mm Hg/min. Post-dialysis extracellular water (ECW)/weight was the volume metric mostly strongly associated with slope (r = 0.34, p = 0.007 for unconditional analysis; β = 1.45, p = 0.001 for conditional analysis). Among subjects with post-dialysis systolic BP ≥130 mm Hg, the association strengthened (r = 0.40, p = 0.006; β = 1.42, p = 0.003). ECV was more strongly associated with the BP slope than with pre-dialysis, post-dialysis, or delta systolic BP (r = -0.07, 0.19, 0.28; p = 0.6, 0.1, 0.03). In nonlinear models, BP trajectory also had the strongest association with post-dialysis ECW/body weight (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In hypertensive hemodialysis patients, measurements of ECV excess are more strongly associated with IBPSs than with pre-dialysis, post-dialysis, or change in systolic BP. Among varying volume metrics, post-dialysis ECW/weight has the strongest association with these slopes. Determining IBPS is a novel method to optimize clinical assessment of ECV in hemodialysis patients.
AB - Background/Aims: Extracellular volume (ECV) overload is a mortality risk factor in hemodialysis patients, but no standard approach exists to objectively assess this clinically. We aimed to quantify relationships between slopes of repeated intradialytic blood pressure (BP) measurements and ECV. Methods: In a cross-sectional study of 71 hemodialysis patients, we calculated BP slopes from all intradialytic measurements using Gaussian regression. We measured extracellular and total body water (TBW) with bioimpedance spectroscopy. We analyzed unconditional and conditional associations between BP slope and volume metrics with mixed linear models and sensitivity analyses using non-linear intradialytic BP trajectory. Results: Mean systolic intradialytic BP slope (IBPS) was -0.06 (0.1) mm Hg/min. Post-dialysis extracellular water (ECW)/weight was the volume metric mostly strongly associated with slope (r = 0.34, p = 0.007 for unconditional analysis; β = 1.45, p = 0.001 for conditional analysis). Among subjects with post-dialysis systolic BP ≥130 mm Hg, the association strengthened (r = 0.40, p = 0.006; β = 1.42, p = 0.003). ECV was more strongly associated with the BP slope than with pre-dialysis, post-dialysis, or delta systolic BP (r = -0.07, 0.19, 0.28; p = 0.6, 0.1, 0.03). In nonlinear models, BP trajectory also had the strongest association with post-dialysis ECW/body weight (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In hypertensive hemodialysis patients, measurements of ECV excess are more strongly associated with IBPSs than with pre-dialysis, post-dialysis, or change in systolic BP. Among varying volume metrics, post-dialysis ECW/weight has the strongest association with these slopes. Determining IBPS is a novel method to optimize clinical assessment of ECV in hemodialysis patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042122270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042122270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000487093
DO - 10.1159/000487093
M3 - Article
C2 - 29439257
AN - SCOPUS:85042122270
SN - 0028-2766
VL - 139
SP - 120
EP - 130
JO - Experimental Nephrology
JF - Experimental Nephrology
IS - 2
ER -