TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial Intelligence for Intraoperative Guidance
T2 - Using Semantic Segmentation to Identify Surgical Anatomy during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
AU - Madani, Amin
AU - Namazi, Babak
AU - Altieri, Maria S.
AU - Hashimoto, Daniel A.
AU - Rivera, Angela Maria
AU - Pucher, Philip H.
AU - Navarrete-Welton, Allison
AU - Sankaranarayanan, Ganesh
AU - Brunt, L. Michael
AU - Okrainec, Allan
AU - Alseidi, Adnan
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: There were no sources of funding for this manuscript. D.A. is a consultant for Johnson & Johnson Institute, Verily Life Sciences, Worrell, and Mosaic Research Management. D.A. and A.N.W. have received grant funding from Olympus. A.O. has received honoraria for speaking and teaching from Medtronic, Ethicon, and Merck. A.A. is a consultant for Johnson & Johnson Institute.
Funding Information:
Disclosures: A.M., B.N., M.S.A., A.M.R., P.P., G.S., L.M.B., and A.A. have no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article. D.H. is a consultant for Johnson & Johnson Institute, Verily Life Sciences, Worrell, and Mosaic Research Management. D.H. and A.N.W. have received grant funding from Olympus. Dr. Hashimoto has a pending patent on deep learning technology related to automated analysis of operative video that is unrelated to this work. A.O. has received honoraria for speaking and teaching from Medtronic, Ethicon, and Merck.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models that can identify safe and dangerous zones of dissection, and anatomical landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Summary Background Data: Many adverse events during surgery occur due to errors in visual perception and judgment leading to misinterpretation of anatomy. Deep learning, a subfield of AI, can potentially be used to provide real-time guidance intraoperatively. Methods: Deep learning models were developed and trained to identify safe (Go) and dangerous (No-Go) zones of dissection, liver, gallbladder, and hepatocystic triangle during LC. Annotations were performed by 4 high-volume surgeons. AI predictions were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation against annotations by expert surgeons. Primary outcomes were intersection- over-union (IOU) and F1 score (validated spatial correlation indices), and secondary outcomes were pixel-wise accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, ± standard deviation. Results: AI models were trained on 2627 random frames from 290 LC videos, procured from 37 countries, 136 institutions, and 153 surgeons. Mean IOU, F1 score, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the AI to identify Go zones were 0.53 (±0.24), 0.70 (±0.28), 0.94 (±0.05), 0.69 (±0.20). and 0.94 (±0.03), respectively. For No-Go zones, these metrics were 0.71 (±0.29), 0.83 (±0.31), 0.95 (±0.06), 0.80 (±0.21), and 0.98 (±0.05), respectively. Mean IOU for identification of the liver, gallbladder, and hepatocystic triangle were: 0.86 (±0.12), 0.72 (±0.19), and 0.65 (±0.22), respectively. Conclusions: AI can be used to identify anatomy within the surgical field. This technology may eventually be used to provide real-time guidance and minimize the risk of adverse events.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models that can identify safe and dangerous zones of dissection, and anatomical landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Summary Background Data: Many adverse events during surgery occur due to errors in visual perception and judgment leading to misinterpretation of anatomy. Deep learning, a subfield of AI, can potentially be used to provide real-time guidance intraoperatively. Methods: Deep learning models were developed and trained to identify safe (Go) and dangerous (No-Go) zones of dissection, liver, gallbladder, and hepatocystic triangle during LC. Annotations were performed by 4 high-volume surgeons. AI predictions were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation against annotations by expert surgeons. Primary outcomes were intersection- over-union (IOU) and F1 score (validated spatial correlation indices), and secondary outcomes were pixel-wise accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, ± standard deviation. Results: AI models were trained on 2627 random frames from 290 LC videos, procured from 37 countries, 136 institutions, and 153 surgeons. Mean IOU, F1 score, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the AI to identify Go zones were 0.53 (±0.24), 0.70 (±0.28), 0.94 (±0.05), 0.69 (±0.20). and 0.94 (±0.03), respectively. For No-Go zones, these metrics were 0.71 (±0.29), 0.83 (±0.31), 0.95 (±0.06), 0.80 (±0.21), and 0.98 (±0.05), respectively. Mean IOU for identification of the liver, gallbladder, and hepatocystic triangle were: 0.86 (±0.12), 0.72 (±0.19), and 0.65 (±0.22), respectively. Conclusions: AI can be used to identify anatomy within the surgical field. This technology may eventually be used to provide real-time guidance and minimize the risk of adverse events.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - bile duct injury
KW - cholecystectomy
KW - Convolutional neural network
KW - deep learning
KW - deep neural network
KW - go zone
KW - machine learning
KW - no-go zone
KW - patient safety
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134390854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134390854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004594
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004594
M3 - Article
C2 - 33196488
AN - SCOPUS:85134390854
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 276
SP - 363
EP - 369
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
IS - 2
ER -