TY - JOUR
T1 - Antiangiogenic activity of 2-deoxy-D-glucose
AU - Merchan, Jaime R.
AU - Kovács, Krisztina
AU - Railsback, Jaclyn W.
AU - Kurtoglu, Metin
AU - Jing, Yuqi
AU - Piña, Yolanda
AU - Gao, Ningguo
AU - Murray, Timothy G.
AU - Lehrman, Mark A.
AU - Lampidis, Theodore J.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Background:During tumor angiogenesis, endothelial cells (ECS) are engaged in a number of energy consuming biological processes, such as proliferation, migration, and capillary formation. Since glucose uptake and metabolism are increased to meet this energy need, the effects of the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) on in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis were investigated. Methodology/Principal Findings:In cell culture, 2-DG inhibited EC growth, induced cytotoxicity, blocked migration, and inhibited actively forming but not established endothelial capillaries. Surprisingly, 2-DG was a better inhibitor of these EC properties than two more efficacious glycolytic inhibitors, 2-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose and oxamate. As an alternative to a glycolytic inhibitory mechanism, we considered 2-DG's ability to interfere with endothelial N-linked glycosylation. 2-DG's effects were reversed by mannose, an N-linked glycosylation precursor, and at relevant concentrations 2-DG also inhibited synthesis of the lipid linked oligosaccharide (LLO) N-glycosylation donor in a mannose-reversible manner. Inhibition of LLO synthesis activated the unfolded protein response (UPR), which resulted in induction of GADD153/CHOP and EC apoptosis (TUNEL assay). Thus, 2-DG's effects on ECS appeared primarily due to inhibition of LLOS synthesis, not glycolysis. 2-DG was then evaluated in two mouse models, inhibiting angiogenesis in both the matrigel plug assay and the LHBETATAG transgenic retinoblastoma model. Conclusions/Significance:In conclusion, 2-DG inhibits endothelial cell angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo, at concentrations below those affecting tumor cells directly, most likely by interfering with N-linked glycosylation rather than glycolysis. Our data underscore the importance of glucose metabolism on neovascularization, and demonstrate a novel approach for anti-angiogenic strategies. 2010 Merchan et al.
AB - Background:During tumor angiogenesis, endothelial cells (ECS) are engaged in a number of energy consuming biological processes, such as proliferation, migration, and capillary formation. Since glucose uptake and metabolism are increased to meet this energy need, the effects of the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) on in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis were investigated. Methodology/Principal Findings:In cell culture, 2-DG inhibited EC growth, induced cytotoxicity, blocked migration, and inhibited actively forming but not established endothelial capillaries. Surprisingly, 2-DG was a better inhibitor of these EC properties than two more efficacious glycolytic inhibitors, 2-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose and oxamate. As an alternative to a glycolytic inhibitory mechanism, we considered 2-DG's ability to interfere with endothelial N-linked glycosylation. 2-DG's effects were reversed by mannose, an N-linked glycosylation precursor, and at relevant concentrations 2-DG also inhibited synthesis of the lipid linked oligosaccharide (LLO) N-glycosylation donor in a mannose-reversible manner. Inhibition of LLO synthesis activated the unfolded protein response (UPR), which resulted in induction of GADD153/CHOP and EC apoptosis (TUNEL assay). Thus, 2-DG's effects on ECS appeared primarily due to inhibition of LLOS synthesis, not glycolysis. 2-DG was then evaluated in two mouse models, inhibiting angiogenesis in both the matrigel plug assay and the LHBETATAG transgenic retinoblastoma model. Conclusions/Significance:In conclusion, 2-DG inhibits endothelial cell angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo, at concentrations below those affecting tumor cells directly, most likely by interfering with N-linked glycosylation rather than glycolysis. Our data underscore the importance of glucose metabolism on neovascularization, and demonstrate a novel approach for anti-angiogenic strategies. 2010 Merchan et al.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149450359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149450359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0013699
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0013699
M3 - Article
C2 - 21060881
AN - SCOPUS:78149450359
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 5
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 10
M1 - e13699
ER -