TY - JOUR
T1 - An Implementation Science Approach to Handoff Redesign in a Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit
AU - Geoffrion, Tracy R.
AU - Lynch, Isaac P.
AU - Hsu, William
AU - Phelps, Eleanor
AU - Minhajuddin, Abu
AU - Tsai, Edward
AU - Timmons, Andrew
AU - Greilich, Philip E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to recognize Kenni Landgraf, the project coordinator; Choafan Yuan, MS, and Jerzy Lysikowski, PhD, for data analysis; and Amanda Fox, MD, Steven Hill, MD, Susan Hernandez, BSN, MBA, and Michael Jessen, MD, for their leadership in Anesthesiology, Critical Care, Nursing Sevices, and Cardiothoracic Surgical teams, respectively. The ECHO-ICU Collaborative is composed of students, trainees, faculty, and staff from the Departments of Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Nursing Services, and the Office of Quality Safety and Outcomes Education. This work was funded, in part, by a grant from the University of Texas System Patient Safety Committee (Research Grant Award, OGC Grant # 162292) and the University of Texas Southwestern Clements University Hospital Nursing Sevices.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to recognize Kenni Landgraf, the project coordinator; Choafan Yuan, MS, and Jerzy Lysikowski, PhD, for data analysis; and Amanda Fox, MD, Steven Hill, MD, Susan Hernandez, BSN, MBA, and Michael Jessen, MD, for their leadership in Anesthesiology, Critical Care, Nursing Sevices, and Cardiothoracic Surgical teams, respectively. The ECHO-ICU Collaborative is composed of students, trainees, faculty, and staff from the Departments of Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Nursing Services, and the Office of Quality Safety and Outcomes Education. This work was funded, in part, by a grant from the University of Texas System Patient Safety Committee (Research Grant Award, OGC Grant # 162292 ) and the University of Texas Southwestern Clements University Hospital Nursing Sevices .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Background: The ability of handoff redesign to improve short-term outcomes is well established, yet an effective approach for achieving widespread adoption is unknown. An implementation science–based approach capable of influencing the leading indicators of widespread adoption was used to redesign handoffs from the cardiac operating room to the intensive care unit. Methods: A transdisciplinary, unit-based team used a 12-step implementation process. The steps were divided into 4 phases: planning, engaging, executing, and evaluating. Based on unit-determined best practices, a “handoff bundle” was designed. This included team training, structured education with video illustration, and cognitive aids. Fidelity and acceptability were measured before, during, and after the handoff bundle was deployed. Results: Redesign and implementation of the handoff process occurred over 12 months. Multiple rapid-cycle process improvements led to reductions in the handoff duration from 12.6 minutes to 10.7 minutes (P < .014). Fidelity to unit-determined handoff best practices was assessed based on a sample of the cardiac surgery population preimplantation and postimplementation. Twenty-three handoff best practices (information and tasks) demonstrated improvements compared with the preimplementation period. Provider satisfaction scores 2.5 years after implementation remained high compared with the redesign phase (87 vs. 84; P = .133). Conclusions: The use of an implementation-based approach for handoff redesign can be effective for improving the leading indicators of successful adoption of a structured handoff process. Future quality improvement studies addressing sustainability and widespread adoption of this approach appear to be warranted, and should include the relationships to improved care coordination and reduced preventable medical errors.
AB - Background: The ability of handoff redesign to improve short-term outcomes is well established, yet an effective approach for achieving widespread adoption is unknown. An implementation science–based approach capable of influencing the leading indicators of widespread adoption was used to redesign handoffs from the cardiac operating room to the intensive care unit. Methods: A transdisciplinary, unit-based team used a 12-step implementation process. The steps were divided into 4 phases: planning, engaging, executing, and evaluating. Based on unit-determined best practices, a “handoff bundle” was designed. This included team training, structured education with video illustration, and cognitive aids. Fidelity and acceptability were measured before, during, and after the handoff bundle was deployed. Results: Redesign and implementation of the handoff process occurred over 12 months. Multiple rapid-cycle process improvements led to reductions in the handoff duration from 12.6 minutes to 10.7 minutes (P < .014). Fidelity to unit-determined handoff best practices was assessed based on a sample of the cardiac surgery population preimplantation and postimplementation. Twenty-three handoff best practices (information and tasks) demonstrated improvements compared with the preimplementation period. Provider satisfaction scores 2.5 years after implementation remained high compared with the redesign phase (87 vs. 84; P = .133). Conclusions: The use of an implementation-based approach for handoff redesign can be effective for improving the leading indicators of successful adoption of a structured handoff process. Future quality improvement studies addressing sustainability and widespread adoption of this approach appear to be warranted, and should include the relationships to improved care coordination and reduced preventable medical errors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077919155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077919155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.047
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.047
M3 - Article
C2 - 31706873
AN - SCOPUS:85077919155
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 109
SP - 1782
EP - 1788
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 6
ER -