TY - JOUR
T1 - An end-user's guide to the HEART score and pathway
AU - Long, Brit
AU - Oliver, Joshua
AU - Streitz, Matthew
AU - Koyfman, Alex
PY - 2017/2/12
Y1 - 2017/2/12
N2 - Background: Chest pain accounts for a significant percentage of emergency department (ED) presentations. The HEART score and pathway have demonstrated an ability to appropriately risk stratify and discharge from the ED a significant proportion of patients. Objective: This review evaluates vital components of the HEART score and pathway, while discussing important considerations for current and future use. Discussion: Chest pain is a common ED presentation, and several conditions associated with chest pain result in patient morbidity and mortality. One major disease is acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite the fear associated with this disease, it accounts for a minority of patients with chest pain in the ED. Emergency physicians rarely miss myocardial infarction (MI) or ACS, with miss rates. <. 1%. Many have sought a score and pathway that allow physicians to safely and reliably risk stratify patients. The HEART score and pathway have revolutionized chest pain evaluation, as they can risk stratify a significant number of patients accurately into separate categories based on history, electrocardiogram (ECG), troponin, age, and risk factors while displaying high sensitivity for MACE. Several intricacies must be considered in the use of this score including risk factors, ECG, troponin, age, history, gestalt, follow up, borderline score, and shared decision making. The HEART pathway can supplement clinician decision making. Conclusions: Appropriate use of the HEART pathway reliably risk stratifies patients. Physicians must consider several key components when utilizing the HEART pathway, and future directions may incorporate other patient factors.
AB - Background: Chest pain accounts for a significant percentage of emergency department (ED) presentations. The HEART score and pathway have demonstrated an ability to appropriately risk stratify and discharge from the ED a significant proportion of patients. Objective: This review evaluates vital components of the HEART score and pathway, while discussing important considerations for current and future use. Discussion: Chest pain is a common ED presentation, and several conditions associated with chest pain result in patient morbidity and mortality. One major disease is acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite the fear associated with this disease, it accounts for a minority of patients with chest pain in the ED. Emergency physicians rarely miss myocardial infarction (MI) or ACS, with miss rates. <. 1%. Many have sought a score and pathway that allow physicians to safely and reliably risk stratify patients. The HEART score and pathway have revolutionized chest pain evaluation, as they can risk stratify a significant number of patients accurately into separate categories based on history, electrocardiogram (ECG), troponin, age, and risk factors while displaying high sensitivity for MACE. Several intricacies must be considered in the use of this score including risk factors, ECG, troponin, age, history, gestalt, follow up, borderline score, and shared decision making. The HEART pathway can supplement clinician decision making. Conclusions: Appropriate use of the HEART pathway reliably risk stratifies patients. Physicians must consider several key components when utilizing the HEART pathway, and future directions may incorporate other patient factors.
KW - Chest pain
KW - HEART
KW - Pathway
KW - Risk
KW - Score
KW - Shared decision making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016773316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016773316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.047
DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.047
M3 - Article
C2 - 28363616
AN - SCOPUS:85016773316
SN - 0735-6757
JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
ER -