TY - JOUR
T1 - Alternative splicing in prostate cancer
AU - Paschalis, Alec
AU - Sharp, Adam
AU - Welti, Jonathan C.
AU - Neeb, Antje
AU - Raj, Ganesh V.
AU - Luo, Jun
AU - Plymate, Stephen R.
AU - de Bono, Johann S.
N1 - Funding Information:
A.P. gratefully acknowledges research funding from Cancer Research UK and the Wellcome Trust. A.S. gratefully acknowledges research funding from the Academy of Medical Sciences, the Medical Research Council, and Prostate Cancer UK. G.V.R. gratefully acknowledges research funding from the US Department of Defense. J.L. gratefully acknowledges research funding from the US Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program (grant W81XWH-15-2-0050) and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grant R01 CA185297). S.R.P. gratefully acknowledges research funding from the Lopker Family Foundation, the National Cancer Institute Center for Strategic Scientific Initiatives (P01CA163227 and P50CA097186), the Prostate Cancer Foundation, the US Department of Defense, Medical Research and Material Command (W81XWH-12-PCRP-TIA and W81XWH-15-2-0052), and the US Department of Veterans Affairs (5I01BX003324). J.S.d.B. gratefully acknowledges research funding from Cancer Research UK, the Movember Foundation, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, Prostate Cancer UK, Stand Up To Cancer, the UK Department of Health through an Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre grant, and the US Department of Defense.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - Androgen receptor (AR) splice variants (AR-Vs) have been implicated in the development and progression of metastatic prostate cancer. AR-Vs are truncated isoforms of the AR, a subset of which lack a ligand-binding domain and remain constitutively active in the absence of circulating androgens, thus promoting cancer cell proliferation. Consequently, AR-Vs have been proposed to contribute not only to resistance to anti-androgen therapies but also to resistance to radiotherapy in patients receiving combination therapy by promoting DNA repair. AR-Vs, such as AR-V7, have been associated with unfavourable clinical outcomes in patients; however, attempts to specifically inhibit or prevent the formation of AR-Vs have, to date, been unsuccessful. Thus, novel therapeutic strategies are desperately needed to address the oncogenic effects of AR-Vs, which can drive lethal forms of prostate cancer. Disruption of alternative splicing through modulation of the spliceosome is one such potential therapeutic avenue; however, our understanding of the biology of the spliceosome and how it contributes to prostate cancer remains incomplete, as reflected in the dearth of spliceosome-targeted therapeutic agents. In this Review, the authors outline the current understanding of the role of the spliceosome in the progression of prostate cancer and explore the therapeutic utility of manipulating alternative splicing to improve patient care.
AB - Androgen receptor (AR) splice variants (AR-Vs) have been implicated in the development and progression of metastatic prostate cancer. AR-Vs are truncated isoforms of the AR, a subset of which lack a ligand-binding domain and remain constitutively active in the absence of circulating androgens, thus promoting cancer cell proliferation. Consequently, AR-Vs have been proposed to contribute not only to resistance to anti-androgen therapies but also to resistance to radiotherapy in patients receiving combination therapy by promoting DNA repair. AR-Vs, such as AR-V7, have been associated with unfavourable clinical outcomes in patients; however, attempts to specifically inhibit or prevent the formation of AR-Vs have, to date, been unsuccessful. Thus, novel therapeutic strategies are desperately needed to address the oncogenic effects of AR-Vs, which can drive lethal forms of prostate cancer. Disruption of alternative splicing through modulation of the spliceosome is one such potential therapeutic avenue; however, our understanding of the biology of the spliceosome and how it contributes to prostate cancer remains incomplete, as reflected in the dearth of spliceosome-targeted therapeutic agents. In this Review, the authors outline the current understanding of the role of the spliceosome in the progression of prostate cancer and explore the therapeutic utility of manipulating alternative splicing to improve patient care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052958753&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052958753&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41571-018-0085-0
DO - 10.1038/s41571-018-0085-0
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30135575
AN - SCOPUS:85052958753
SN - 1759-4774
VL - 15
SP - 663
EP - 675
JO - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
JF - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
IS - 11
ER -