TY - JOUR
T1 - Adverse events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings
T2 - An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Ceban, Felicia
AU - Abayomi, Naomi
AU - Saripella, Aparna
AU - Ariaratnam, Jennita
AU - Katsnelson, Glen
AU - Yan, Ellene
AU - Englesakis, Marina
AU - Gan, Tong J.
AU - Joshi, Girish P.
AU - Chung, Frances
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Objective: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be at increased risk for adverse events during procedural sedation, however, there remains a gap in the literature quantifying these risks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of peri-procedural adverse events in OSA patients undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings, compared to those without OSA. Methods: Four databases were systematically searched for studies published from January 1, 2011 to January 4, 2024. The inclusion criteria were: adult patients with OSA undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings, peri-procedural adverse events reported, and control group included. The primary outcome was the incidence of peri-procedural adverse events amongst patients with vs without OSA. Results: Nineteen studies (27,973 patients) were included. The odds of respiratory adverse events were significantly increased for patients with OSA (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.03–2.66, P = 0.04). Furthermore, the odds of requiring an airway maneuver/intervention were significantly greater for patients with OSA (OR 3.28, 95 % CI 1.43–7.51, P = 0.005). The odds of cardiovascular adverse events were not significantly increased for patients with OSA. Conclusion: Patients with OSA undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings had 1.7-fold greater odds of respiratory adverse events and 3.3-fold greater odds of requiring airway maneuvers/interventions.
AB - Objective: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be at increased risk for adverse events during procedural sedation, however, there remains a gap in the literature quantifying these risks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of peri-procedural adverse events in OSA patients undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings, compared to those without OSA. Methods: Four databases were systematically searched for studies published from January 1, 2011 to January 4, 2024. The inclusion criteria were: adult patients with OSA undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings, peri-procedural adverse events reported, and control group included. The primary outcome was the incidence of peri-procedural adverse events amongst patients with vs without OSA. Results: Nineteen studies (27,973 patients) were included. The odds of respiratory adverse events were significantly increased for patients with OSA (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.03–2.66, P = 0.04). Furthermore, the odds of requiring an airway maneuver/intervention were significantly greater for patients with OSA (OR 3.28, 95 % CI 1.43–7.51, P = 0.005). The odds of cardiovascular adverse events were not significantly increased for patients with OSA. Conclusion: Patients with OSA undergoing procedural sedation in ambulatory settings had 1.7-fold greater odds of respiratory adverse events and 3.3-fold greater odds of requiring airway maneuvers/interventions.
KW - Adverse events
KW - Ambulatory surgery
KW - Cardiorespiratory complications
KW - Non-operating room anesthesia
KW - Obstructive sleep apnea
KW - Procedural sedation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211213101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85211213101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102029
DO - 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102029
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39657452
AN - SCOPUS:85211213101
SN - 1087-0792
VL - 80
JO - Sleep Medicine Reviews
JF - Sleep Medicine Reviews
M1 - 102029
ER -