TY - JOUR
T1 - Active reprioritization of the reading worklist using artificial intelligence has a beneficial effect on the turnaround time for interpretation of head ct with intracranial hemorrhage
AU - O’neill, Thomas J.
AU - Xi, Yin
AU - Stehel, Edward
AU - Browning, Travis
AU - Ng, Yee Seng
AU - Baker, Chris
AU - Peshock, Ronald M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the University of Texas (UT) Southwestern Division of Neuroradiology and its faculty, fellows, and residents who participated in this research on workflow. We would also like to acknowledge the UT Southwestern PACS administrators and other IT professionals who assisted in the implementation and integration of the software used in this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2021.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Purpose: To determine how to optimize the delivery of machine learning techniques in a clinical setting to detect intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on non–contrast-enhanced CT images to radiologists to improve workflow. Materials and Methods: In this study, a commercially available machine learning algorithm that flags abnormal noncontrast CT examinations for ICH was implemented in a busy academic neuroradiology practice between September 2017 and March 2019. The algorithm was introduced in three phases: (a) as a “pop-up” widget on ancillary monitors, (b) as a marked examination in reading worklists, and (c) as a marked examination for reprioritization based on the presence of the flag. A statistical approach, which was based on a queuing theory, was implemented to assess the impact of each intervention on queue-adjusted wait and turnaround time compared with historical controls. Results: Notification with a widget or flagging the examination had no effect on queue-adjusted image wait (P > .99) or turnaround time (P = .6). However, a reduction in queue-adjusted wait time was observed between negative (15.45 minutes; 95% CI: 15.07, 15.38) and positive (12.02 minutes; 95% CI: 11.06, 12.97; P < .0001) artificial intelligence–detected ICH examinations with reprioritization. Reduced wait time was present for all order classes but was greatest for examinations ordered as routine for both inpatients and outpatients because of their low priority. Conclusion: The approach used to present flags from artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to the radiologist can reduce image wait time and turnaround times.
AB - Purpose: To determine how to optimize the delivery of machine learning techniques in a clinical setting to detect intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on non–contrast-enhanced CT images to radiologists to improve workflow. Materials and Methods: In this study, a commercially available machine learning algorithm that flags abnormal noncontrast CT examinations for ICH was implemented in a busy academic neuroradiology practice between September 2017 and March 2019. The algorithm was introduced in three phases: (a) as a “pop-up” widget on ancillary monitors, (b) as a marked examination in reading worklists, and (c) as a marked examination for reprioritization based on the presence of the flag. A statistical approach, which was based on a queuing theory, was implemented to assess the impact of each intervention on queue-adjusted wait and turnaround time compared with historical controls. Results: Notification with a widget or flagging the examination had no effect on queue-adjusted image wait (P > .99) or turnaround time (P = .6). However, a reduction in queue-adjusted wait time was observed between negative (15.45 minutes; 95% CI: 15.07, 15.38) and positive (12.02 minutes; 95% CI: 11.06, 12.97; P < .0001) artificial intelligence–detected ICH examinations with reprioritization. Reduced wait time was present for all order classes but was greatest for examinations ordered as routine for both inpatients and outpatients because of their low priority. Conclusion: The approach used to present flags from artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to the radiologist can reduce image wait time and turnaround times.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107481309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107481309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/ryai.2020200024
DO - 10.1148/ryai.2020200024
M3 - Article
C2 - 33937858
AN - SCOPUS:85107481309
SN - 2638-6100
VL - 3
JO - Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
JF - Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
IS - 2
M1 - e200024
ER -