TY - JOUR
T1 - ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Blunt Chest Trauma-Suspected Cardiac Injury
AU - Expert Panels on Cardiac Imaging and Thoracic Imaging
AU - Stojanovska, Jadranka
AU - Hurwitz Koweek, Lynne M.
AU - Chung, Jonathan H.
AU - Ghoshhajra, Brian B.
AU - Walker, Christopher M.
AU - Beache, Garth M.
AU - Berry, Mark F.
AU - Colletti, Patrick M.
AU - Davis, Andrew M.
AU - Hsu, Joe Y.
AU - Khosa, Faisal
AU - Kicska, Gregory A.
AU - Kligerman, Seth J.
AU - Litmanovich, Diana
AU - Maroules, Christopher D.
AU - Meyersohn, Nandini
AU - Syed, Mushabbar A.
AU - Tong, Betty C.
AU - Villines, Todd C.
AU - Wann, Samuel
AU - Wolf, Stephen J.
AU - Kanne, Jeffrey P.
AU - Abbara, Suhny
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Ghoshhajra reports grants and other support from Siemens Healthineers, outside the submitted work. Dr Kanne reports other support from Parexel International, outside the submitted work. Dr Tong reports personal fees from Medtronic, Inc, outside the submitted work. The other authors state that they have no conflict of interest related to the material discussed in this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American College of Radiology
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Blunt cardiac injuries range from myocardial concussion (commotio cordis) leading to fatal ventricular arrhythmias to myocardial contusion, cardiac chamber rupture, septal rupture, pericardial rupture, and valvular injuries. Blunt injuries account for one-fourth of the traumatic deaths in the United States. Chest radiography, transthoracic echocardiography, CT chest with and without contrast, and CT angiography are usually appropriate as the initial examination in patients with suspected blunt cardiac injury who are both hemodynamically stable and unstable. Transesophageal echocardiography and CT heart may be appropriate as examination in patients with suspected blunt cardiac injuries. This publication of blunt chest trauma–suspected cardiac injuries summarizes the literature and makes recommendations for imaging based on the available data and expert opinion. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
AB - Blunt cardiac injuries range from myocardial concussion (commotio cordis) leading to fatal ventricular arrhythmias to myocardial contusion, cardiac chamber rupture, septal rupture, pericardial rupture, and valvular injuries. Blunt injuries account for one-fourth of the traumatic deaths in the United States. Chest radiography, transthoracic echocardiography, CT chest with and without contrast, and CT angiography are usually appropriate as the initial examination in patients with suspected blunt cardiac injury who are both hemodynamically stable and unstable. Transesophageal echocardiography and CT heart may be appropriate as examination in patients with suspected blunt cardiac injuries. This publication of blunt chest trauma–suspected cardiac injuries summarizes the literature and makes recommendations for imaging based on the available data and expert opinion. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
KW - AUC
KW - Appropriate Use Criteria
KW - Appropriateness Criteria
KW - Blunt chest trauma
KW - Cardiac injury
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Hemodynamic stability
KW - Imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093112031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85093112031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 33153551
AN - SCOPUS:85093112031
SN - 1558-349X
VL - 17
SP - S380-S390
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 11
ER -