TY - JOUR
T1 - ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Nonspecific Chest Pain-Low Probability of Coronary Artery Disease
AU - Expert Panel on Cardiac Imaging:
AU - Beache, Garth M.
AU - Mohammed, Tan Lucien H.
AU - Hurwitz Koweek, Lynne M.
AU - Ghoshhajra, Brian B.
AU - Brown, Richard K.J.
AU - Davis, Andrew M.
AU - Heitner, John
AU - Hsu, Joe Y.
AU - Johri, Amer M.
AU - Khosa, Faisal
AU - Kligerman, Seth J.
AU - Litmanovich, Diana
AU - Maroules, Christopher D.
AU - Meyersohn, Nandini
AU - Tomaszewski, Christian A.
AU - Villines, Todd C.
AU - Wann, Samuel
AU - Abbara, Suhny
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American College of Radiology
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Patients with acute nonspecific chest pain and low probability for coronary disease remain an important clinical management dilemma. We focus on evidence for imaging, in an integrated decision-making setting. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
AB - Patients with acute nonspecific chest pain and low probability for coronary disease remain an important clinical management dilemma. We focus on evidence for imaging, in an integrated decision-making setting. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
KW - AUC
KW - Acute
KW - Appropriate Use Criteria
KW - Appropriateness Criteria
KW - Atypical chest pain
KW - Emergency Department
KW - Imaging
KW - Nonspecific chest pain
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093669508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85093669508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 33153548
AN - SCOPUS:85093669508
SN - 1558-349X
VL - 17
SP - S346-S354
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 11
ER -