TY - JOUR
T1 - Acknowledging and addressing real-world challenges to treating immune-related adverse events
AU - von Itzstein, Mitchell S.
AU - Gerber, David E
AU - Bermas, Bonnie L.
AU - Meara, Alexa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024.
PY - 2024/7/22
Y1 - 2024/7/22
N2 - Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized oncology treatment. However, their success is mitigated by the recognition that ICI-induced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose considerable challenges to patients and clinicians. These autoimmune toxicities are heterogeneous, unpredictable, and reflect a disease state resulting from a change in the immune system of patients. This contrasts with the typical acute nature of toxicities from chemotherapy and molecularly targeted oncology therapies. Management is further complicated by the extended bioavailability of these agents in patients as well as the persistence of autoimmune pathology. Currently, irAE treatment remains suboptimal in many areas, as many expert guidelines remain vague on the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of steroids and the use of other immunosuppressive agents. This coupled with delays in diagnosis and difficulties for patients accessing effective irAE treatment results in barriers to effective irAE care. The latter is complicated by the lack of US Food and Drug Administration-approved irAE treatments that lead to insurance denials, as well as the high cost of biological immunosuppressant therapies. Fortunately, rheumatologists and other subspecialists with expertize in the management of chronic autoimmune conditions have become more involved in irAE diagnosis and management and may help navigate treatment. In this commentary, we discuss these issues and propose potential solutions to advance the field.
AB - Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized oncology treatment. However, their success is mitigated by the recognition that ICI-induced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose considerable challenges to patients and clinicians. These autoimmune toxicities are heterogeneous, unpredictable, and reflect a disease state resulting from a change in the immune system of patients. This contrasts with the typical acute nature of toxicities from chemotherapy and molecularly targeted oncology therapies. Management is further complicated by the extended bioavailability of these agents in patients as well as the persistence of autoimmune pathology. Currently, irAE treatment remains suboptimal in many areas, as many expert guidelines remain vague on the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of steroids and the use of other immunosuppressive agents. This coupled with delays in diagnosis and difficulties for patients accessing effective irAE treatment results in barriers to effective irAE care. The latter is complicated by the lack of US Food and Drug Administration-approved irAE treatments that lead to insurance denials, as well as the high cost of biological immunosuppressant therapies. Fortunately, rheumatologists and other subspecialists with expertize in the management of chronic autoimmune conditions have become more involved in irAE diagnosis and management and may help navigate treatment. In this commentary, we discuss these issues and propose potential solutions to advance the field.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199408490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85199408490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jitc-2024-009540
DO - 10.1136/jitc-2024-009540
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39038920
AN - SCOPUS:85199408490
SN - 2051-1426
VL - 12
JO - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
JF - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
IS - 7
M1 - e009540
ER -