A randomized, crossover comparison of ketamine and electroconvulsive therapy for treatment of major depressive episodes: A Canadian biomarker integration network in depression (CAN-BIND) study protocol

Jennifer L. Phillips, Natalia Jaworska, Elizabeth Kamler, Venkat Bhat, Jean Blier, Jane A. Foster, Stefanie Hassel, Keith Ho, Lisa McMurray, Roumen Milev, Zahra Moazamigoudarzi, Franca M. Placenza, Stéphane Richard-Devantoy, Susan Rotzinger, Gustavo Turecki, Gustavo H. Vazquez, Sidney H. Kennedy, Pierre Blier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


Background: Recent evidence underscores the utility of rapid-acting antidepressant interventions, such as ketamine, in alleviating symptoms of major depressive episodes (MDE). However, to date, there have been limited head-to-head comparisons of intravenous (IV) ketamine infusions with other antidepressant treatment strategies in large randomized trials. This study protocol describes an ongoing multi-centre, prospective, randomized, crossover, non-inferiority trial comparing acute treatment of individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode (MDE) with ketamine and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) on efficacy, speed of therapeutic effects, side effects, and health care resource utilization. A secondary aim is to compare a 6-month maintenance strategy for ketamine responders to standard of care ECT maintenance. Finally, through the measurement of clinical, cognitive, neuroimaging, and molecular markers we aim to establish predictors and moderators of treatment response as well as treatment-elicited effects on these outcomes. Methods: Across four participating Canadian institutions, 240 patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder experiencing a MDE are randomized (1:1) to a course of ECT or racemic IV ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) administered 3 times/week for 3 or 4 weeks. Non-responders (< 50% improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] scores) crossover to receive the alternate treatment. Responders during the randomization or crossover phases then enter the 6-month maintenance phase during which time they receive clinical assessments at identical intervals regardless of treatment arm. ECT maintenance follows standard of care while ketamine maintenance involves: weekly infusions for 1 month, then bi-weekly infusions for 2 months, and finally monthly infusions for 3 months (returning to bi-weekly in case of relapse). The primary outcome measure is change in MADRS scores after randomized treatment as assessed by raters blind to treatment modality. Discussion: This multi-centre study will help identify molecular, imaging, and clinical characteristics of patients with treatment-resistant and/or severe MDEs who would benefit most from either type of therapeutic strategy. In addition to informing clinical practice and influencing health care delivery, this trial will add to the robust platform and database of CAN-BIND studies for future research and biomarker discovery. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03674671. Registered September 17, 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number268
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jun 2 2020
Externally publishedYes


  • Biomarkers
  • Bipolar disorder
  • Clinical trial
  • Depression
  • Electroconvulsive therapy
  • Genomics
  • Intravenous ketamine
  • Major depressive disorder
  • Neuroimaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized, crossover comparison of ketamine and electroconvulsive therapy for treatment of major depressive episodes: A Canadian biomarker integration network in depression (CAN-BIND) study protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this