A randomized controlled trial of presatovir for respiratory syncytial virus after lung transplant

Jens Gottlieb, Fernando Torres, Tarik Haddad, Gundeep Dhillon, Daniel F. Dilling, Christiane Knoop, Reinaldo Rampolla, Rajat Walia, Vivek Ahya, Romain Kessler, Marie Budev, Claus Neurohr, Allan R. Glanville, Robert Jordan, Danielle Porter, Matt McKevitt, Polina German, Ying Guo, Jason W. Chien, Timothy R. WatkinsMartin R. Zamora

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in lung transplant recipients is associated with high morbidity. This study evaluated the RSV fusion inhibitor presatovir in RSV-infected lung transplant recipients. Methods: In this international Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02534350), adult lung transplant recipients with symptomatic confirmed RSV infection for ≤7 days received oral presatovir 200 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 14, or placebo (2:1), with follow-up through day 28. There were 2 coprimary endpoints: time-weighted average change in nasal RSV load from day 1 to 7, calculated from nasal swabs, in the full analysis set ([FAS]; all patients who received study drug and had quantifiable baseline nasal RSV load) and time-weighted average change in nasal RSV load from day 1 to 7 in the subset of patients with pretreatment symptom duration at the median or shorter of the FAS. Secondary endpoints were changes in respiratory infection symptoms assessed using the Influenza Patient-Reported Outcomes questionnaire and lung function measured by spirometry. Results: Sixty-one patients were randomized, 40 received presatovir, 20 placebo, and 54 were included in efficacy analyses. Presatovir did not significantly improve the primary endpoint in the FAS (treatment difference [95% CI], 0.10 [−0.43, 0.63] log10 copies/ml; p = 0.72) or the shorter symptom-duration subgroup (−0.12 [−0.94, 0.69] log10 copies/ml; p = 0.76). Secondary endpoints were not different between presatovir and placebo groups. Presatovir was generally well tolerated. Conclusions: Presatovir treatment did not significantly improve change in nasal RSV load, symptoms, or lung function in lung transplant recipients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)908-916
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume42
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023

Keywords

  • RSV fusion inhibitor
  • lung transplant
  • presatovir
  • randomized controlled trial
  • respiratory syncytial virus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized controlled trial of presatovir for respiratory syncytial virus after lung transplant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this