TY - JOUR
T1 - A phase i trial of tailored radiation therapy with concomitant cetuximab and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with cervical cancer
T2 - A gynecologic oncology group study
AU - Moore, Kathleen N.
AU - Sill, Michael W.
AU - Miller, David S.
AU - McCourt, Carolyn
AU - De Geest, Koen
AU - Rose, Peter G.
AU - Cardenes, Higinia R.
AU - Mannel, Robert S.
AU - Farley, John H.
AU - Schilder, Russell J.
AU - Fracasso, Paula M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants to the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office ( CA 27469 ), the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center ( CA 37517 ).The following Gynecologic Oncology Group member institutions participated in this study: University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Indiana University School of Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, University of Chicago, Women and Infants Hospital and Georgia CCOP.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Background: Epithelial growth factor receptor over-expression correlates with poor outcomes in cervical cancer. This study assessed the safety of chemoradiation with cetuximab in the treatment of women with newly diagnosed locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: Patients received weekly cisplatin 30 and 40 mg/m2 [dose level (DL) 1 and 2] and cetuximab 400 mg/m 2 loading dose and then 250 mg/m2 for a total of six weeks with radiotherapy (RT). Patients with nodal metastases received extended field radiation therapy (EFRT). At the maximum tolerated dose, feasibility was evaluated in a 20 patient two-stage, sequential design. Results: In patients receiving pelvic RT, seven were treated at DL 1 with one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (febrile neutropenia with grade 3 diarrhea) and three at DL 2 with two DLTs (grade 3 rash and delay in RT > 8 weeks). The feasibility phase was opened at DL1. Of the 21 patients treated there was one DLT (grade 4 CVA). Median RT duration was 50 days (range, 42-70). In patients receiving EFRT, nine were treated at DL 1 with 1 DLT (grade 3 mucositis) and 24 in the feasibility phase with eight DLTs [delay in RT > 8 weeks due to toxicity (2) and one each with grade 3 or 4 small bowel obstruction, embolism, mucositis, mucositis with hypokalemia, pain with headache, and platelets with mucositis and headache]. Median EFRT duration was 56 days (range, 36-74). Conclusions: For patients receiving pelvic RT, cisplatin and cetuximab were feasible. For patients receiving EFRT, combination of cisplatin and cetuximab was not feasible.
AB - Background: Epithelial growth factor receptor over-expression correlates with poor outcomes in cervical cancer. This study assessed the safety of chemoradiation with cetuximab in the treatment of women with newly diagnosed locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: Patients received weekly cisplatin 30 and 40 mg/m2 [dose level (DL) 1 and 2] and cetuximab 400 mg/m 2 loading dose and then 250 mg/m2 for a total of six weeks with radiotherapy (RT). Patients with nodal metastases received extended field radiation therapy (EFRT). At the maximum tolerated dose, feasibility was evaluated in a 20 patient two-stage, sequential design. Results: In patients receiving pelvic RT, seven were treated at DL 1 with one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (febrile neutropenia with grade 3 diarrhea) and three at DL 2 with two DLTs (grade 3 rash and delay in RT > 8 weeks). The feasibility phase was opened at DL1. Of the 21 patients treated there was one DLT (grade 4 CVA). Median RT duration was 50 days (range, 42-70). In patients receiving EFRT, nine were treated at DL 1 with 1 DLT (grade 3 mucositis) and 24 in the feasibility phase with eight DLTs [delay in RT > 8 weeks due to toxicity (2) and one each with grade 3 or 4 small bowel obstruction, embolism, mucositis, mucositis with hypokalemia, pain with headache, and platelets with mucositis and headache]. Median EFRT duration was 56 days (range, 36-74). Conclusions: For patients receiving pelvic RT, cisplatin and cetuximab were feasible. For patients receiving EFRT, combination of cisplatin and cetuximab was not feasible.
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Cetuximab
KW - Pelvic radiation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868530868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868530868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.030
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 22960004
AN - SCOPUS:84868530868
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 127
SP - 456
EP - 461
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 3
ER -